PUBLICATION ETHIC

PUBLICATION ETHICS
Journal Publication Ethics Guidelines
The peer-reviewed publication of articles in Journal Of Psychology, Counseling And Education is an important cornerstone in the development of coherent and respected knowledge networks. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree on standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: authors, journal editors, peer reviewers, publishers, and the public.

The Indramayu Islamic Lecturers' Association as the publisher of Psicoeducation: Journal Of Psychology, Counseling And Education, takes the trusteeship of all stages of publishing seriously and we are aware of ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprinting or other commercial revenue does not impact or influence editorial decisions.

Publication Decision
The editor of Journal Of Psychology, Counseling And Education is responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers should always drive the decision. Editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and limited by applicable legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors may confer with other editors or reviewers when making these decisions.

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts on the basis of their intellectual content without regard to the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy.

Confidentiality
Editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the associated authors, reviewers, prospective reviewers, other editorial advisors, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Unpublished material disclosed in submitted manuscripts may not be used in the editor's own research without written permission from the author.

Reviewer Task
Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer reviews assist editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving papers.

Speed
Any elected referee who feels unqualified to review research reported in a manuscript or knows that an immediate review is not possible must notify the editor and seek permission from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscript received for review must be treated as a confidential document. The document may not be shown or discussed with others except with the permission of the editor.

Objectivity Standards
The review must be carried out objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees must express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Source Acknowledgment
Reviewers must identify relevant published works that have not been cited by the authors. Any statement that states observations, derivations, or arguments have been previously reported must be accompanied by relevant citations. A reviewer should also call the editor's attention if there are substantial similarities or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers of which they are personally aware.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts to have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any authors, companies, or institutions associated with the paper.

Author assignment
Reporting Standards
Authors of original research reports must provide an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data must be presented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to enable others to replicate the work. False or intentionally inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism
Authors must ensure that they have written all original work, and if the author has used the work and/or words of others that the work has been properly cited or cited.

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication
An author generally should not publish manuscripts describing substantially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting a script