Analysis of Accountability and Supervision and Solutions to Guidance and Counseling Problems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58355/psy.v3i1.49Keywords:
Accountability, Supervision, Solutions, Guidance and CounselingAbstract
Understand the concept of accountability and supervision in the context of guidance and counseling, as well as to identify the requirements, forms, criteria, supporting factors, obstacles, implications, problems and solutions related to the implementation of accountability and supervision. The research methodology used is the library method, where information is collected from various literary sources such as books, scientific reports and journal articles. Literature research is used to collect relevant information from various sources to support analysis of the concepts of accountability and supervision. The research results show that the concept of accountability and supervision in the context of guidance and counseling includes an understanding of responsibility to be accountable for performance or actions to the authorities. Accountability involves responsibility for performance results and services provided, while supervision involves monitoring and evaluation to ensure that organizational operations follow established procedures and guidelines. The implementation of accountability and supervision involves supporting and inhibiting elements as well as suggested solutions.
Downloads
References
Astramovich, R. L. & Coker, J. K. (2007). The Accountability Bridge Model for Counselors. Journal of Counseling and Development, 85, 162-172
Bastian, Indra, (2010). Akuntansi Sektor Publik Suatu Pengantar Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Diniaty, A. (2012). Evaluasi Bimbingan Konseling. Pekanbaru: Zanafa Publishing.
Depdiknas. (2009). Bahan Belajar Mandiri Kelompok Kerja Pengawas Sekolah Dimensi Kompetensi Supervisi Manajerial. Dirjen PMPTK: Jakarta.
Dahir C., & Stone C. (2003). Assessment of school counselor needs for professional development survey (ASCNPD). Unpublished survey.
Gibson, R. L., & Mitchell, M. H. (1981). Introduction to Counseling and Guidance (2nd ed). New York: Mc Millan Publishing.
Keputusan Menpan No. 25/KEP/M.PAN/2/2004 tentang Pedoman Umum Penyusunan Indeks Kepuasan Masyarakat Unit Pelayanan Instansi Pemerintah.
Kurniawan Teguh. 2007. Akuntabilitas, Transparansi dan Pengawasan. Power Point Persentation. Yogyakarta: UGM.
Neviarni. (2023). Manajemen Bimbingan dan Konseling di Sekolah. Jakarta : Kencana.
Perusse, R., & Goodnough, G. E. (Eds.). (2004). Leadership, Advocacy,And Direct Service Strategies For Professional School Counselors. Pacific Grove, CA: Thomson Learning/Brooks/Cole.
Purba, S. (2018). Profesionalisme dan Kompetensi Pengawas Sekolah Dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Dan Kinerja Sekolah. GENERASI KAMPUS, 7(2.
Schmidt, J. J. (2003). Counseling in Schools: Essential services and Comprehensive Programs (4th ed). Boston, MA.: Allyn & Bacon.
Surya Dharma. (2006). Kepemimpinan Pengawas Sekolah: Mengembangkan Budaya Tanggung Jawab. Dalam Jurnal Tenaga Kependidikan. Vol. 1, No. 2-Agustus, hal. 9.jn.
Sink, Christopher. 2009. School Counselor as Accountability Leaders: Another Call for Action. Profesional School Counseling. December. vol.13, 2.
White, France A. 2007. The Profesional School Counselor’s Chalange: Accountability. Journal of Profesional counseling, Practice, Theory, and Research. Spring. Vol. 35, 6.
Yusuf, A. Muri. (2002). Seminar Sehari Akuntabilitas Pelayanan Bimbingan dan Konseling. Padang: Jurusan BK, FIP UNP.
